On June 14th I reached out to Newell again since I did not receive a response from my June 9th email. But, that is partly my fault since I didn’t really ask a question. How could I expect Paul “33.33333%” Newell to answer a question that I never clearly asked? He has trouble answering the questions that are clearly asked. So, with my expectations of Paul decreasing with every email exchange, I try to ask clear and concise questions. I thought I would keep it to two questions so he would have an easier time answering both. And since its two he would answer both completely and concisely. Right? Plus, if he answered out of order, a simpleton like myself could surely keep track and know which questions were answered and which weren’t. So here is my email to Paul:
Can I assume from your lack of response that you are fine with TAPs characterization of elder elected officials? And can I further assume they are coordinating efforts with your campaign?
Here is one of the places TAP's own Phil Anderson makes disturbing comments that are offensive. Tomorrow, I will post the final email of this saga. (I think) I feel some of you may be thinking of scheduling your root canal for tomorrow just to avoid reading any more of this exchange. But, if you bear with me I would like to ask for you help in responding to our very own thirty-three percenter. Here is a story about TAP calling Bruno old.
Until tomorrow…
Comments